Why Print Was an Excellent Conceptual Vehicle for my Project ‘Speak Up’
Read the Full Article

Keywords

Feminist methodology
Conceptual vehicle
Sexual harassment
Sexual assault
Sexism

How to Cite

Drake, K. . (2024). Why Print Was an Excellent Conceptual Vehicle for my Project ‘Speak Up’. IMPACT Printmaking Journal, 2, 11. https://doi.org/10.54632/524.IMPJ11

Abstract

“I give away my power. In side-stepping, in not calling out the sexist remarks, I act as if they are in the right, I act as if women should not have voices, and I act as if I am not a feminist.” (Pine, 2019. p.188)

Influenced by the continual sharing amongst my friends and colleagues of experiences of sexism, sexual harassment and assault happening to us in public where no one spoke up at the time, my MA major project, ‘Speak Up’, used a feminist methodology to research the reasons why we don’t speak up when these incidents occur. It concluded by both representing these incidents and why they weren’t called out in print-based artworks, with the intention of prompting dialogue.

This paper will explore the hypothesis that print was an excellent ‘conceptual vehicle’ (Harding, 2013. p.107) for this project.

https://doi.org/10.54632/524.IMPJ11
Read the Full Article

References

Artforum (2022). Warhol’s Marylin Shatters Auction Record for American Artist at $195 million, 10 May 2022. Available at https://

www.artforum.com/news/warhol-s-marilyn-shatters-auction-recordfor-american-artist-at-195-million-88547 {Accessed 20 June 2022}.

Balfour, B. 2016. ‘The What and the Why of Print’ in Pelzer-Montada, R. ed., 2018. Perspectives on Contemporary Printmaking. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp.114-126.

Brisolara, S. 2003. Invited Reaction: Feminist Inquiry, Frameworks, Feminisms, and Other “F” Words. Human Resource Development Quarterly. [e-journal] Vol.14, no.1, Spring 2003. Available through ARU Library website [Accessed 12 February 2020].

Deleuze, G. 1994. Difference and Repetition. Translated by P. Patton. New York, Columbia University Press.

Finlayson, L, 2016. An introduction to Feminism. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Harding, R. 2013. ‘Print as Other; The Future is Queer, in Pelzer-Montada, R. ed., 2018. Perspectives on Contemporary Printmaking. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp.104-113.

Haraway, D. 2002. The Persistence of Vision. In Mirzoeff, N., d., 2002. The Visual Culture Reader. New York. Routledge.

Hays, A. 2017. Reading the Margins: Embedded Narratives in Feminist Personal Zines. In: The Journal of Popular Culture, Vol.50, No. 1 [e-journal] Vol.50, No. 1 (2017) Available through ARU Library website [Accessed 12 February, 2020].

Hedinger, J M. and Rogger, B. 2018. PROVOCATION-PROTEST-ART A Menage-a-Trois. In: Rogger, B., Voegeli, J., and Widmer, R. eds., 2018. PROTEST. The Aesthetics of Resistance. Zurich: Lars Muller. pp. 118-121.

Nagy Hesse-Biber, S. 2012. Feminist Research: Exploring, Interrogating, and Transforming the Interconnections of Epistemology, Methodology and Method. In: Nagy Hesse-Biber, 2012. Handbook of Feminist Research: Theory and Practice. [e-book]. Ch.1. Available through ARU Library website [Accessed 12 May 2021].

Pelzer-Montada, R. 2001. Authenticity in Printmaking – A Red Herring?. In IMPACT 2 Conference Proceedings. Available at [Accessed 19 June 2022}.

Pine, E., 2019. Notes to self. London: Penguin Random House.

Presser, L. 2005. Negotiating Power and Narrative in Research: Implications for Feminist Methodology. Signs. [e-journal] Vol.30, No.4. Available through ARU Library website [Accessed 12 February2021].

Reeves, K. 1999. ‘The Re-Vision of Printmaking’, in Pelzer-Montada, R. ed., 2018. Perspectives on Contemporary Printmaking. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp.72-81.

The BBC (2022) Warhol’s Marylin Monroe painting sold for record-breaking $195m, 10 May 2022. Available at www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-61339179 [Accessed 20 June 2022].

Triantafillou, E. 2010. ‘All the Instruments Agree’, in Pelzer-Montada, R. ed., 2018. Perspectives on Contemporary Printmaking. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp.288-294.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Katy Drake

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.